College students cancelled grants poor students that the controversy due to wear brand-name shoes-plustek

College students wear brand shoes canceled student grants, poor students found controversy recently, net post "wearing Nike shoes canceled student grants" aroused netizens hot discussion. According to the authors, the university has a classmate, always wearing yellow shoes to play cracking, home to live frugally for several months, he bought sixty percent off doubles Nike shoes. He treasures every kick the ball to brush again. Later, his grant eligibility was canceled, just because "poor students should have poor students like", he cried for a long time, I buy a pair of Nike shoes, will be canceled the Grant Eligibility? This discussion raises the topic more than 20000 in micro-blog, and in the newspaper administrative micro-blog push, also had to read 100 thousand +. What do you think of it? The most vicious words are "poor students should be poor". "I heard the most vicious words, poor students should have poor students.". I would like to ask, what is poor students, only to wear ragged? Can’t we have a little love for beauty? Or should we discard dignity and live in pity?" This review won 5540 praise! This represents the views of many netizens – poverty or not really is a pair of Nike shoes can explain it? @ good blogger comments: I think many people the wrong question. This is mainly to say that poor students can not pursue a better life? Poor students must have the appearance of poor students? Poor students should also be respected, not the ones who get paid for it. I do not understand what is called poor students, poor students should have what kind of appearance? Poor students should have that line, for example, family income, community proof and so on. If all the procedures are reasonable, he is a poor student. Instead of a family for a long time and bought a pair of good shoes and denied he was poor, but this is a poor young families do their best to meet him and his peers who seek the minimum. Right: 77 @ Shao to see so many replies, I want to ask you really read this article? First of all, is the mother to buy shoes, the children did not know, if he knows will not agree, the students did not buy any worth showing off things for yourself, but don’t pick up the students, this is called vanity? Second, vanity and the pursuit of aesthetic is not the same. @ WTO said, this is typical of the feudal ethics and asceticism. @ ah babble: not every di6 boy to wear brand-name, and buy a pair of how, grant is not used subsidies to poor families, let the children of a poor family like clothing, like a normal person, if the poor get grants, or all dare not eat, dare not wear, dare to use, then we have grants do what? Weihnachtsfest: poor students is what you told me, with dishevelled hair and a dirty face? Hungry? Ragged? So you’re going to say, look, ah, that guy, poor, even a little did not tidy up, all day mess. Home distressed children, live frugally to buy good stuff, you said that people wear so good, what is poverty? Always reluctant to have poor people with malicious newspaper can. Is it the tragedy of the times or the tragedy of human nature? Grants are

大学生因穿名牌鞋被取消助学金 贫困生认定引争议近日,网帖“因穿耐克鞋被取消助学金”引起网友热议。作者称,大学时有个同学,打球总穿着开裂发黄的鞋子,家里省吃俭用几个月,给他买了双打四折的耐克鞋。他视如珍宝,每次打完球都要刷一遍才行。后来他的助学金资格被取消了,只因“贫困生就该有贫困生的样子”,他为此哭了很久,我买一双耐克鞋,就要被取消助学金资格吗?这个讨论在微博上引起了两万多的话题量,而在中青报官微的推送中,也早已过10万+的阅读量。大家都是怎么看的呢?最恶毒的话,莫过于“贫困生该有贫困的样子”“我曾听见最恶毒的话莫过于,贫困生就应该有贫困生的样子。我想问一下,贫困生是什么样子,是只能穿得破烂?不能有一点爱美之心?还是应该把尊严丢弃,然后在怜悯的目光下生存?”这条评论获得了5540个赞!这代表了很多网友的看法——贫困与否真的是一双耐克鞋可以说明的吗?@善良博主:我觉得评论里很多人审错题了。本文主要是说难道贫困生就不能追求美好生活吗?贫困生就要有贫困生的样子?贫困生也应该被尊重…而不是助学金到底被谁拿了的问题。@晴霸气额:我不明白什么叫做贫困生就该有贫困生该有的样子?贫困生应该是有那条划分线吧,比如说按家庭年收入社区证明等等。如果一切程序合理,他就是贫困生。而不是一个家庭省吃俭用好久买了双不错的鞋子而否定他贫穷,这不过是一个贫穷的少年家庭尽最大的努力满足了他和同龄人一样的最小的那份追求。@权劭77:看了这么多回复,我想问问你们真的看了这篇文章吗?首先,鞋是母亲给买的,孩子并不知情,若他知情定不会同意,这位同学并没有为自己买过任何值得炫耀的东西,而是捡同学不要的,这叫爱慕虚荣?第二,爱慕虚荣和追求审美是不一样的。@入世求道:这就是典型的存天理灭人欲。@呀咿呀di6灵童:又不是天天穿名牌,省吃俭用买一双怎么了,助学金不就是拿来补助贫困人家的么,让贫困人家的孩子能够像正常人一样吃穿,穷人如果拿了助学金,还是整天不敢吃,不敢穿,不敢用,那么我们还发助学金做什么?Weihnachtsfest:贫困生该是什么样子你告诉我,蓬头垢面?食不果腹?衣衫褴褛?那么你是不是又要说,看啊,那个人,穷就算了,还一点没收拾,整天乱七八糟的。家里心疼孩子,省吃俭用给买点好东西,你又说人家穿的那么好,还算什么穷困生?向来不愿怀揣不善,可世人皆以恶意报之。是时代的悲剧还是人性的悲剧?助学金本来就是该给最需要的人啊!还有一部分网友认为,助学金本来就应该是给最需要的人,能买得起耐克鞋,说明还没有到“最需要”的程度。@演员梁鑫:我觉得学校做的很合理,我是校领导我也取消,把这个给更不会有虚荣心需要帮助的孩子买点书籍读物,十几块的球鞋就不能就不能穿了?通篇充斥着对好衣服的渴望,这样的孩子还需要再领着贫困生的补助吗?我上学时候宿舍也有贫困生,每顿饭就是馒头榨菜,给的奖学金贫困金全部买书了,说我将来自己挣!@Jzx犀牛:你拿着苹果还要助学金,你让别人怎么想,别人也会议论学校的,一种是真穷,还有一种是懒穷,你属于那种?不要怪我,我只是认为钱要用到真正需要的人身上。@YUANYUE09414:一双耐克鞋对于穷人来说可以买好多东西了,何必要去追求一个名牌呢?我没穿过不照样活得好好的?钱要花在刀刃上啊!再说老妈省吃俭用下来买的鞋踩在地上心里畅快吗?@鱼丸粗面俊俊 : 妈妈省吃俭用花五百多给孩子买耐克鞋,这没有错,穷人一样有资格吃好的用好的,但不要用爱模糊规则。现在讲的是助学金的问题,不是说母爱的问题,助学金涉及到的不只是你是穷人的问题,它还有个特性,就是名额有限。条件不好的学生那么多,你能省下500多,别人想省也省不了。名额就几个,肯定给别人了。助学金被取消,因为他谈了个女朋友还有许多网友,是来讲故事的……@九月纷飞雪:我有个大学同学,家里也很困难,后来他谈了个女朋友,因为生活费不多,两个人很少下饭店,平时都在学校食堂吃饭,就这班长发现了,取消了他的助学金,原因就是因为他谈了女朋友。@河图奥特曼:这件事还真不好评判,但我想吐槽的是明明很多人一看家庭条件不错还可以领特困这件事。高中就有一个这样同学,这同学虽然人挺好,也没啥道德问题,一直很低调,但是居然领特困补助,每天晚上放学貌似都打车回家,我是真无语了。@缘何悟空:同班干,每次遇到把自己写得特惨的人,你还不好不通过,一个用着笔记本,ipad,并且每年换最新的iphone,整天就是出去玩,把自己写得特别惨,我们不通过,给辅导员看的时候,辅导员竟然把另一个确实很贫困、节约而且很努力的一个名额给了她,那天我们几个班干集体辞了班干。@AlllYours:每年假期都去打工跑销售,去年寒假只休息了春节两天,年底最后一个月业务公司第三,老板奖励了一个iPhone6,在班里却成为了我不能评助学金的理由,你没有一个贫困生该有的样子!@锦夜如画_ : 想当年 我们学校喝牛奶的不能领助学金。高校助学金真的被用在实处了吗?还有许多网友,是质疑高校助学金的执行系统的。@李脩惠:很多学校助学金获得者都很有钱,真正需要的人却申领不到,早就已经脱离了助学这个词的含义。@阿陵子:我们学校贫困生评定需要学生公开竞选演讲,不仅要讲给其他贫困生听,还要讲给其他不是贫困生的班里同学听,好像要全世界知道,我有多惨!然后还让不是贫困生的同学给他们评定等级,也是醉了!@何艳东Confidence:大学的助学金评比现实是很混乱的,有需要的没有帮助上,反而给了一些不需要的人!大学生家庭经济困难,可以得到哪些资助?在大一新生收到高校录取通知书的同时,会收到一本由财政部教科文司、教育部财务司和全国学生资助管理中心联合编印的《高等学校学生资助政策简介》,这本小册子里详细介绍了高校资助政策,包括国家奖学金、国家励志奖学金、国家助学金、国家助学贷款、师范生免费教育、退役士兵教育资助、基层就业学费补偿助学贷款代偿、服义务兵役国家资助、直招士官国家资助、新生入学资助项目、绿色通道、勤工助学、学费减免等。学生入学前一般可以在家乡申请办理生源地信用助学贷款,能基本解决学费和住宿费问题;去学校报到时可以走“绿色通道”;入学后可以申请国家助学金,孩子在学有余力的情况下可以申请勤工助学,如果学习成绩优秀还可以申请国家奖学金或国家励志奖学金等。学校怎样认定家庭经济困难学生?学生本人向学校提出家庭经济困难学生认定申请,提交经家庭所在地的乡镇或街道民政部门核实盖章的《高等学校学生及家庭情况调查表》(《高等学校学生资助政策简介》小册子里有,也可从全国学生资助管理中心网站下载),学校收到学生申请后,经审核,以民主评议的方式认定。申请国家助学金需要什么条件?高校全日制本专科生符合以下几个基本条件就可以向学校申请国家助学金:一是热爱社会主义祖国,拥护中国共产党的领导;二是遵守宪法和法律,遵守学校规章制度;三是诚实守信,道德品质优良;四是勤奋学习,积极上进;五是家庭经济困难,生活俭朴。全国高校本专科生国家助学金平均标准为每生每年3000元,可分设2-3档。具体标准,中央高校由财政部商有关部门确定,地方高校由各省(自治区、直辖市)确定。有人认为,很多学生自己都不知道国家助学金发放的具体政策,同时,即便知道助学金发放存在问题,却也不知道该如何维权,找谁维权。因此,要想使助学金发放给最需要的人,除了要积极向高校学生宣传国家的助学政策外,更需要第三方介入,对高校的助学金发放行为进行监督。可以通过审计、抽检等手段,发现相关问题,并在此基础上及时纠正,或对相关责任人进行问责,“自上而下”予以监督。还应开辟投诉和反馈渠道,供学生发现问题后及时反馈,“自下而上”反映问题。如此,才能构筑一个较为完善的监督体系,从而保障学生的利益不被侵犯。加载中…相关的主题文章: